- From the beginning of the crisis, we have called for cessation of violence in all its forms and by all sides
- We voted in favour of the resolution in the UN General Assembly that authorized the appointment of an Envoy to engage with the Syrian parties and foreign actors for the resolution of the crisis.
- We also supported resolutions 2042 and 2043 in expectation that the establishment of the United Nations Supervision Mission in Syria (UNSMIS) will be able to oversee the implementation of Mr Annan’s six-point plan
- Instead of a political process, parties have continued to pursue a military approach that continues to cause death and destruction in the country
- There is an urgent need for the Syrian parties to recommit themselves to the complete cessation of violence and comprehensive implementation of the six-point plan.
- Syria has both historically and in contemporary times been an important country in the Middle East. Its role in the Middle East peace process and in the stability of the wider region cannot be overemphasized. Prolonged instability and unrest in Syria, therefore, have ramifications for the entire region and beyond.
- it would have been preferable for the Council members to show flexibility so that a united message could be conveyed to all sides to the Syrian crisis instead of pursuance of domestic interests
- It is, therefore, regrettable that the Council has not been able to adopt the resolution today and send a joint message
Sunday, July 22, 2012
EOV on syria issue
Labels:
India and World,
International,
syria
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment